Sunday, May 13, 2012

Damini - Movie Review and a Lawyer's take

Delayed Justice

Mahatama Gandhi, the father of our nation had once said, “There is a higher court than courts of justice and that is the court of conscience. It supercedes all other courts.”

It is on these very lines that the movie Damini is based. It gives us a wonderful opportunity to relate law and films with burning issues like delayed justice, our present society and women

Damini was a multi starrer film where Rishi Kapoor, Amrish Puri and Sunny Deol did justice to their respective roles. And above all it was Meenakshi Sheshadre who played the lead protagonist in this movie and impressed one and all.

Damini, in English language means lightning. Lightning by its might can act as a device of death and can destroy and destruct anything and everything but on the other hand when accompanied by rain it brings happiness and prosperity to one and all. We can very well conclude that the title of the movie is quite significant and apt keeping in mind the story and the issues raised.

Damini, in this movie is a young matured girl and hails from a very poor background. But her conscience is governed is by higher moral and objective principles of justice, truth and equality for one and all in the society. She is quite unhappy about the fact that people never stick to these universally accepted norms which have been considered good and justified since ages. They just see their personal interest and nothing else. She is married to a very rich person named Shekhar Gupta who always has all praises for her unlike his rest of the family. He admires her allot just because of these very special qualities which can rarely be found in any person in today’s materialistic world.

The real problem arises when their domestic help Urmi is gang raped by her brother-in-law and three of his friends. The Gupta family including her husband tries their best to convince her not to bring this issue into limelight as it would hamper their name and fame. They secretly try to dispose of the matter by luring the victim’s relative with money and even try to get her killed. This is where the issue of corruption among public officials and authorities comes up in the movie. The victim is finally killed and Damini’s conscience does not allow her to remain silent as she cannot bear the death of an innocent young lady who had been serving them since years together.

She eventually loses the support of her family and the husband is kept aloof from all this. In the court of justice she is posed with all kind of hideous questions and situations by the lawyer. He makes things extremely difficult for her by asking all sorts of questions related to a woman’s privacy and no objection is raised. She is falsely proved to be mentally retarded and sent to a mental hospital. There, she is subjected to all kinds of mental and physical tortures and sufferings in spite of her being perfect.

Through all such incidences the movie very well highlights the issue of women oppression and feminism by the society, specially the rich for their self interest.Now, somehow she manages to escape and finally reaches Govind who is also a lawyer. It is here that the role of the legal personality who has been taken into contention starts.

Govind was initially a lawyer but in the present circumstances remains secluded and separated from the society and public life. His wife was killed by a drunk driver in a road accident and since then his attitude towards life has really been disheartening. He lost all his courage after that and gave up the legal profession. Currently, he always remains lost in her memory and is mostly drunk every time. The basic reason for all this is that justice was never administered to him while fighting for his wife’s cause. It was because of the delay in decision making by the courts and the case was never decided. Since then he has lost all faith in the justice delivery system of the country and is very distressed.

But the plight of Damini and the motivation given to him by her inspires him to get back into his original role and fight for her cause. And this time he his firmly determined to see that justice is rendered to Damini.

There are various attributes of his which were really very impressive and gave him a edge over his opponent. These finally helped him to win an almost completely lost case. They are:

He was mentally very active and acted in a clever way unlike his opponent, i.e. to say he remained stuck to the basics and brought in limelight that how the other party contradicted their own arguments which had been put up by them earlier. In one hearing they contended the proposition that Damini is mentally retarded and in the other they proposed that she was very intelligent. He showed full presence of mind while questioning all the key witnesses. By just mere play of words, he made sure that all of them utter the real truth which he knew was present in some hidden corners of their mind. And without making much of an effort he was quite successful in doing so. He left them without any chance to manipulate the reality.

According to the need of the hour, he was cool, calm and composed on one hand and aggressive, self-expressive, assertive and argumentative on the other. All the latter ones are very well illustrated by the well known “taareekh pe tareekh” dialogue and various other scenes. He was loyal and trustworthy unlike his opponent who was shrewd and cunning and adopted any and every unfair means to see that he won the case.He was physically very strong to deal with all kinds of out of court dangers and attacks and gave back a befitting reply. Although, this attribute is not that important for a lawyer to possess as it is not the demand of the profession and it is not everyone’s cup of tea to have it, especially women. But then in today’s world people resort to all sorts of unfair physical means and try to resolve cases out of court. Therefore, this attribute of the fictional lawyer here keeping in mind the plot of the movie is very much appreciable.

Although, there exist two legal personalities in this movie but the above mentioned factors of Govind give him an upper edge over Indrajit Chaddha. Moreover, Chaddha leaves no stone unturned to manipulate the facts of the case and is even able to convince the judge also. He acts in an unethical way unlike Govind and this is where all the difference arises. Govind follows ethics all throughout and finds everything very difficult in the beginning. But then it is because of all this only that he gets the case decided in his and Damini’s favor. This can very well be termed as the basic reason for the preference of Govind over Chaddha between the fictional lawyer who impressed me through this film.

Legal issues raised
Apart from issues like feminism, oppression of the poor by the rich, delay in justice delivery, corruption etc. the prime legal issue about which we are concerned here is rape.

As per Sec 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, a man is said to commit an offence of rape with a woman under any of the following conditions:
• Sexual intercourse against the victim’s will
• Without the victims consent
• With her consent, when her consent has been obtained by putting her or any person that she may be interested in fear of death or hurt
• With her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband
• With her consent, when at the time of giving such consent she was intoxicated, or is suffering from unsoundness of mind and does not understand the nature and consequences of that to which she gives consent
• With or without her consent when she is under sixteen years of age

The rape committed in the movie is the one where there has sexual intercourse against the victim’s will. It is violative of Article 21 of the constitution which talks about Right to life & liberty. Related Case is, Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal [2004] 9 SC 751 where a security guard had raped and murdered a 14 year old girl at her residence.

Section 375 therefore requires:
• Sexual intercourse by a man with a woman;
• The sexual intercourse must be under any of the six circumstances given in the section.

Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1983:
The Criminal Law Amendment Act has substantially changed Sections 375 and 376 of the IPC. Several new sections have been introduced therein- viz. Sections 376(A), 376(B), 376(C), 376(D) of the IPC.

Section 376(A) punishes sexual intercourse with wife without her consent by a judicially separated husband.
Section 376(B) punishes for sexual intercourse by a public servant with a woman in custody.
Section 376(C) punishes sexual intercourse by superintendent of jail, remand house, etc. whereas,
Section 376(D) punishes sexual intercourse by any member of the management or staff of a hospital with any woman in that hospital.

These new sections have been introduced with a view to stop sexual abuse of women in custody, care and control by various persons- which though not amounting to rape were nevertheless considered highly reprehensible.

The movie very well highlights the fact that how our society is unconcerned towards the poor and needy. In times of deaths, they try to compensate the life of a person in terms of money. Even public officials designated to serve the society become corrupt. Justice delivery system of our country is very inefficient and needs a revolutionary change for quick decision making.

No comments:

Post a Comment